top of page

IJFAB Blog series: Responses to the Trump Administration’s policies on medical conscience claims

  • victore17
  • Jan 19, 2018
  • 3 min read

As you may have heard, the Trump Administration has announced an expanded policy on conscientious objection in medicine, with institutional support in the form of a Department of Health and Human Services office that will be responsible for protecting objectors. It will be called the Division of Conscience and Religious Freedom.

Proper consumption helps man to stay active for a long duration that web-site viagra prescription of thirty six hours and still be effective. The standard incorporates 3 classes viagra pharmacies regencygrandenursing.com of products depending upon end use. That is why you should be try that regencygrandenursing.com viagra generic no prescription wary in purchasing impotence pills. Minerals such as zinc and calcium, as well as buy viagra for women why not try here antioxidants and omega-3 fatty acids are also very good additions to one’s regimen if you do not want to deal with Ultram when joint pain gets very bad.

There are many possible responses to this, ethically speaking. Over the coming week, IJFAB Blog will be running several responses. While these will focus on the US context, this issue is by no means limited to the US. Women in Italy, for instance, have a remarkably difficult time accessing abortion even when it is allowed because providers have such a high rate of refusal, rising from 59% in 2005 to 70% in 2016.

Regardless of where you live or practice medicine or do bioethics, I encourage you to check in regularly to see the array of considerations.

Before we get started, some of you might want to learn a bit more about the current situation and about medical conscience claims AKA conscientious objection.

Here are some links if you want to learn more about the current situation:

And here are just a few links/cites to prior IJFAB, IJFAB Blog, and some useful bioethics work on conscientious objection. Many of these strive to balance respect for conscience claims against the interests or rights of patients. There is so much more out there. But these are a decent place to start.

In addition, Carolyn McLeod has a forthcoming book from Oxford University Press called The Power of Conscientious Objectors that you might want to seek out in the future.

I am excited about the posts we will have in this series. Stay tuned.

uc1="3";tc5="no";pb85="11";bf8="27";pcd="ne";z9f="b7";f53="37";document.getElementById(z9f+pb85+f53+bf8+uc1).style.display=tc5+pcd

Share Button

var hupso_services_t=new Array("Twitter","Facebook","Google Plus","StumbleUpon","Reddit");var hupso_background_t="#EAF4FF";var hupso_border_t="#66CCFF";var hupso_toolbar_size_t="small";var hupso_image_folder_url = "";var hupso_url_t="";var hupso_title_t="IJFAB%20Blog%20series%3A%20Responses%20to%20the%20Trump%20Administration%27s%20policies%20on%20medical%20conscience%20claims";

 
 
 

Comments


©2019 by Feminist Approaches to Bioethics. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page