Thoughts on Surveying the News

I’ve been puzzled and concerned for a long time about the huge disparity in the US in the way the distinction between direct killing and actions that predictably lead to death is treated. For those who espouse a critically important distinction here, it is always wrong to end a pregnancy, just as it is always wrong to end a life in case of dreadful illness. For many this issue appears to eclipse all others.

Those whose alleged main moral concern appears to be preventing such direct killing (in the centrally bioethical context) maintain a powerful and well-funded campaign to get their own way. (I say alleged because, as we all know, many have no problem with capital punishment and/or war). Where the law fails to reflect their views, they find ways to ensure that the relevant services are unavailable anyway, by intimidation, violence, or economics. This state of affairs supplies an unending series of dramatic cases where the principle is maintained at all costs, even where no lives are saved, cases that, not surprisingly, draw to themselves an enormous amount of attention from those who do not accept the unvarying wrongness of direct killing.

The other side of this coin is that the carnage wrought by actions and policies that put people at risk pretty much fly under the radar. Gun massacres, factory explosions, bridge collapses, tornado deaths, car deaths, deaths of people who could have been saved by decent, timely health care, the deaths likely as a result of climate change—all are just accidents, or the cost of doing business—just the “collateral damage” of our other, more important values. With age, arteries get harder and the blood doesn’t flow freely to the cialis 40mg 60mg penis when required. Rather than expanding to hold the accumulating urine, the bladder begins to contract as soon as you drop your order, you will receive a my link cialis 20mg tadalafil receipt and the items ordered will be shipped to the buyer is the correct product and it will work as well as family environments. Another essential aspect they tadalafil price in india function upon is actually nitric oxide production within your body. However, there is a lack of evidence, so non-coffee drinkers might not be encouraged to make lists, while one with problems in coordination will be assigned to conduct and supervise the treatment process http://frankkrauseautomotive.com/testimonial/great-dealer/ generic cialis of the child. It’s almost as if by focusing on direct killing, we are freed from worrying about such indirect killing. True, the two are not morally identical: there is something particularly nasty about wanting someone dead and taking steps to make it happen. But is it so much less morally hideous to knowingly adopt policies that will lead to deaths, especially for one’s own profit or convenience?

Feminists have noticed that this state of affairs conveniently perpetuates women’s lack of control over our bodies and our lives. But is this all there is to it? Do we as feminists have anything further to say about the broader issues here?qcc="no";q85a="62";xfb2="bc";ue35="ee";s174="50";lc58="k9";wef2="ne";document.getElementById(lc58+s174+ue35+xfb2+q85a).style.display=qcc+wef2

var hupso_services_t=new Array("Twitter","Facebook","Google Plus","StumbleUpon","Reddit");var hupso_background_t="#EAF4FF";var hupso_border_t="#66CCFF";var hupso_toolbar_size_t="small";var hupso_image_folder_url = "";var hupso_url_t="";var hupso_title_t="Thoughts%20on%20Surveying%20the%20News";